Saturday, May 18, 2013

EXPOSURE OF THE MARITIME ACTIVITIES IN THE OCCUPIED AREAS OF CYPRUS


 
           When I went back to the history, I could find only one Turkish-Cypriot ship-owner, named Ahmet Chavush Osmancik, who was born in 1849 in the island of Creta and was later settled in Limassol. He used to have three big boats and other lighters and he had made a name for his work in the Limassol harbour. Ahmet Chavush and 14 other prominent Turkish Cypriots, among them also the famous Kenan brothers from Larnaca, were imprisoned during the First World War for two and a half years in the Kyrenia Castle by the British colonial government. They were accused of making plans in order to free the Ottoman prisoners of war, who were kept in Karavoulis/Famagusta. (1) When Ahmet Chavush was set free, he bought a big boat and named it as “Osmancik” (the little Ottoman). (2) When he died in 1930, the Greek Cypriot tradesmen and foreigners were among the people, who attended his funeral in Limassol. (3) During the rest of the British administration and after the independence of the island, some young Turkish Cypriots used to work as sailors on ships, owned by the Greek Cypriots or foreign companies. 

After the invasion and the occupation of the 37% of the northern territory of the Republic of Cyprus in the summer of 1974, the Turkish Cypriots got the chance to work in the field of maritime activities.  The Famagusta port was opened on 3rd September 1974 and a Turkish Cypriot Ports Authority was established for the functioning of the ports under the control of the Turkish Army. Besides Famagusta, the ports of Kyrenia and Karavostasi (Gemikonagi) started also to offer services. On 3rd October 1974, the Council of Ministers of the Republic of Cyprus issued an Order, which declared the ports of Famagusta, Kyrenia and Karavostasi as closed for all vessels.

The coast line of the occupied part of Cyprus constitutes 50.6% of all the coast line of the island with a length of 396 km. There are four designated sea-ports in the occupied northern part of Cyprus. The principal sea-port is in Famagusta, which is important for cargo transportation. The port has 1,280 metres of quays with drought ranging from 6.7 metres to 11 metres. Some 487,000 square metres of the outer harbour have been turned into an industrial free trade zone in March 1983.

The Kyrenia port is important for tourist and passenger traffic visiting the occupied areas of the island. A new ferryboat port has been constructed in Kyrenia with a depth of 8 metres. There are regular connections to the southern ports of Turkey and less often services to Israel and Syria. The construction of the new tourism port of Kyrenia started in 1983 and it was opened on 16th November 1987 with necessary technical equipment and personnel. It has a capacity for four ferryboats.

In the north of Famagusta port, Gastria (Kalecik-Boghaz) is used as an industrial port, where Cyprus Turkish Petroleum Company and Altınbash Petroleum Company have unloading bays. Boghaz Industry and Mines Company uses these facilities for loading the material from its plaster and cement factories.

Nine miles west of Kyrenia, near Alagadi, there is Teknecik power station, where port facilities are used for unloading fuel oil, which is used for generating electricity since 1976.

At Karavostasi (Gemikonağı) in Morphou Bay in the West, there were facilities of the Cyprus Mining Company for loading copper mine with the help of a 200 m long conveyor, but it is not in use since 1992. In August 2010, it was reported in the Turkish Cypriot press that a new free port will be built there by a company, called “Portisbi”, which rented the plot for 49 years. (4)

99% of all the import and export activities of the Turkish Cypriots are done through maritime lines, involving about 20 companies from the public and the private sectors.

The Cyprus Turkish Shipping Company was established on 12 March 1975 as a joint venture, in which the Maritime Organization of Turkey had 51% of the shares and the Development Bank of the Consolidated Fund of the Turkish Cypriot Communal Chamber had 49% of the shares. This company has at the moment one ferryboat and a vessel for cargo transport, both are registered at the Istanbul harbour and are under the Turkish flag. The ferryboat is named as M/F Bozcaada, which was renovated in 2006 and has a capacity of 315 passengers and sails between Famagusta and Mersin. The other vessel is called M/V Hisar with 7,410 DWT and carries dry cargo from various world harbours.

The Shipyard Famagusta Ltd (previously known as GemYat) is located within the Famagusta port for the maintenance and the repair of the transport vessels. It has 5,500 sqm closed and open areas and three slipways. The company was founded originally by Ramazan Gundogdu, who came from Black Sea region and settled in Famagusta in 1989.

In 2006, 60 fisher-boats, cargo-ships, yachts, ro-ro ships and other vessels were taken care of. Half of them had the flag of the TRNC, 20% of Turkey and 30% of other countries. 65 persons were employed in the shipyard in 2006 and about 500 tons of steel construction was consumed annually. In July 2011 a new pool was bought and it has a capacity of 25,000 DWT.

            TRNC Ship Registry: There were in 1998 a total of 25 ships, 18 of them carrying the flag of the TRNC, 6 the flag of Turkey and one, the flag of Malta. The majority of the ships belong to businessmen from Turkey. These 25 ships had a capacity of carrying 40,710 DWT weight and 2,390 passengers, collecting a venue of 14 million US dollars for the weight they transport. Annual freight expenses of the TRNC was in 1998 30 million US dollars. From the direct revenue of these ships, a total of 42,000 US dollars were cashed in.

            In January 2009, the Union of Turkish Cypriot Ship-owners had 24 members and they were complaining that the number of ships was declining. According to the Annual Report of the Directorate of the Ports Department, the number of registered ships was 44 in 2006, raised to 46 in 2007 and went down to 31 in 2008.

List of ships in service in the occupied areas of Cyprus: (5)

Year       Cargo-ship  Ro/ro  Passenger-ship  Ships for special      Total

  purpose

2006           12             9                      14                9                         44

2007           13             9                      13              11                         46

2008             7             7                        9                8                         31

The Union of Turkish Cypriot Ship-owners demanded among others the reduction of the port taxes and fees, opening of the port services to other private companies, employment of TRNC citizens in the ships with TRNC flags and exemption from customs tax for the material used in the shipyard, reduction of the electricity tariff, issuing certificates by the Ports Authority for the graduates of the local Faculties of Maritime Studies. (6) 

            Cyprus Turkish Dock-workers’ Company was started by a law 6/76 officially in 1976 by the 284 dock-workers, who used to work before 1974 at the Famagusta harbour. No new members were registered since then and in November 1998, there were 98 dockworkers, who shared the whole revenue of the port among themselves. (7) Moreover this company still has the monopoly of handling and storing at the Famagusta harbour and the fees are set by the Ministry of Works and Transport. At the moment, there are only 19 shareholders left and 100-150 dockworkers, who have been working at this company for the last 20-30 years, will be laid off, if the law will be amended and new shareholders will come in from outside the company.

It was reported recently in the press that a bill was presented to the Council of Ministers of the TRNC, which envisaged the selling of the shares of the Cyprus Turkish Dockers’ Company. A Jewish-Turkish Maritime Company, named “Arkas Denizcilik” and based in Izmir, had already bought the shares of a cover-company, called “Portisbi”, which rented three months ago a strategic place with 10,000 sqm in the Famagusta Free Port and Zone for 25 years and which had paid 2 US dollars per sqm. It was reported that the Arkas Maritime Company, which transports cargo containers to the occupied areas of Cyprus will be buying the shares of the Dockers’ company as well. (8)  

Since 2003 the Cyprus Turkish Dockworkers’ Company provided services mainly outside office hours and complaints arouse from the ship-owners that they have to pay every year 500 thousand US dollars for the overtime work at the harbour and the customs.

Distribution of the amount of the weight and the flag of the ships coming to the seaports of the TRNC in 1997 (2003) (9):

Port                 Flag         No of Ships      Weight (tons)      % of the weight

 
Famagusta      TRNC             633              316,804                   53.99

                        TR                  296              169,622                   28.90

                        Foreign           121              100,410                   17.11

                        Total:           1,050 (1,397) 586,836 (370,414) 100.00

___________________________________________________________________                  

Kyrenia           TRNC                21               28,048                   39.08

                        TR                      33               43,720                  60.92

                        Foreign                -                      -                          -

                        Total:                 54               71,768                 100.00

___________________________________________________________________

Teknecik         TRNC                  -                   -                               -

                        TR                        7                54,703               38.41

                        Foreign                 6                87,714               61.59

                        Total:                  13              142,417             100.00

___________________________________________________________________

Kalecik           TRNC                  -                     -                          -

(Petroleum)     TR                       62             134,345                96.73

                        Foreign                 2                  4,543                  3.27

                        Total:                  64             138,888               100.00

_______________________________________________________________

Kalecik           TRNC                 60               124,857                 50.92

(Plaster and     TR                      34                 86,066                  35.10

Cement)           Foreign                2                   4,543                  13.98

                        Total:                106               245,193                100.00

____________________________________________________________________

TRNC Total:   TRNC               714               469,709 tons            39.63

                        TR                     432               488,456 tons            41.22

                        Foreign              141               226,937 tons            19.15

                        Total:              1,287            1,185,102 tons          100.00

 Yacht harbours:

Kyrenia’s old harbour, which up until 1988 was also used by the ferryboats to Turkey, is now being used as a yacht harbour. After the opening of the new touristic harbour, one mile to the east of Kyrenia, all ferryboat traffic has been moved there. The old customs and excise building in the old harbour was completely renovated and redecorated early in 1990 and turned into a yachting centre. (Depth of the port, 3.2 metres) Similarly all moorings were equipped with water and electricity outlets. About 100 yachts and fisher-boats can take shelter here and it belongs to the Evkaf Administration.

There is another marina in the new tourism harbour of Kyrenia, which started giving services in 1996, owned by Gem-yat Delta Marina Ltd. It has a space of 7,500 sqm with 75 berths in the sea and 80 on land.

            There is another possibility for yacht mooring in the harbour of Famagusta, in a special section for yachts and fisher-boats. However, this place lies within the commercial harbour and is therefore likely to be noisy and bothersome to all those, who would rather have a peaceful setting for their mooring. Plans exist for turning the lagoon between the commercial harbour and the Palm Reach Hotel into a yacht harbour.

Those sailing around the eastern Cape of Cyprus, (Zafer Burnu, Cape Andreas) will find another place of anchorage in the fishing harbour of Yeni Erenkoy (Yialousa), which is located on the Karpaz Peninsula in the north-eastern tip of Northern Cyprus. Since Summer 2011, the region’s first-ever luxury marina is called Karpaz Gate Marina and it is owned by Karpaz Bay Resort Ltd, belonging to Jewish and English investors. It offers 300 berths including 15 berths for super yachts and mega yachts up to a maximum of 60 metres in length. Part of the Karpaz Bay Resort, it is being developed to the standards of a first class tourist destination with an expansive 18,000 sqm dry dock for refit and repairs. For yachts sailing to Northern Cyprus for the first time, Karpaz Gate Marina is a recognised port of entry.

The Faculties of Marine Studies in the occupied areas of Cyprus:

1. The Faculty of Maritime Studies of the Near East University in Nicosia was first established in 1996 and gave its first graduates in the year 2000. The Faculty of Maritime Studies applies four-year degree programs in the Departments of Deck, Marine Engineering and Maritime Management and two-year programs in its Vocational School. The initial objective of the Faculty is to train deck and engineering watch keeping officers for the Merchant Marine Fleet; and in addition, to train qualified personnel to meet the demands required for managerial positions. The Faculty of Maritime Studies is collaborating, within a framework of regulations, with the World Maritime Organization and Undersecretary of Maritime Affairs of Republic of Turkey. The Faculty is at internationally acknowledged standards since it provides education through the utilization of latest technologies in accordance with the international laws and regulations. It provides its students with apprenticeship and employment opportunities.

2. The Marine School of the Girne American University in Kyrenia was established in 2007 as Marine school, Department of Logistics and Transportation. At 2010, Deck Department started to function also. In carrying out its mission, Marine School commits to improving Maritime, Transportation and Logistics sector. In today’s competitive environment, the Mariners, Deck Officers and Logisticians who are the graduates of GAU Marine School, are aimed to be fully equipped with technological, language Maritime and Logistics skills. The Techno-park Building, which is an important asset of Marine School, with its various laboratories, provides opportunity for the students to continue their education by transportation and logistics research.

3. Istanbul Technical University (ITU), which was founded in 1773 as the basis of the Ottoman Imperial Naval Architecture, started to build an education and research campus in the TRNC in 2008 in Famagusta. A second campus will be built in Yeni Erenköy (Yialousa). According to the rector of the ITU, North Cyprus was chosen because of its geographical location and the regional and global programs that serve the needs of the Maritime Sector. In the 2011-2012 academic year, a total of 90 students were admitted for the first time in three sections: Marine Transportation and Management Engineering, Naval Architecture and Marine (Ship-mechanics) Engineering and Marine Management Engineering. 30 students were admitted in each section. The language of instruction is in English. The education of students, who do not have a proficient level of English, first undertake a year for preparation. 10% of the students receive a full scholarship quota, 30% in half (50%). A 10% discount will be applied the TRNC citizens.

Other organizations related with Marine Life in the occupied areas of Cyprus:

1. The First Marine Conference of the Ministry of Works and Transport of the TRNC was held in Nicosia in May 1998 and the Final Reports of the Working Groups were published in a book with 187 pages, from where I took some statistics and information.

2. The Cyprus Marine Science Foundation: It was established in the TRNC in 2006. It is an organisation aiming to do research relating to marine sciences, marine biology, marine fisheries, freshwater ecosystems, freshwater biology, and aquaculture within and around the island of Cyprus. The Cyprus Marine Foundation has already conducted several research projects related to fisheries in the Levantine Sea.

3. Marine and Fisheries Research Institute: It was established in September 2011 at the Güzelyurt (Morphou) Campus of the European University of Lefke and is actively encouraging research in Marine Sciences and Fisheries. In addition, the institute is currently running a MSc programme on Fisheries Technology and aiming to open other MSc programmes in the near future.

4. During 24th-27th March 2013, Acapulco Resort Hotel in Northern Cyprus hosted the First International Fisheries Symposium. This symposium organisation was a collaboration between European University of Lefke, Cyprus Marine Science Foundation and the World Sturgeon Conservation Society and supported by the Turkish Cypriot Authorities. In all, the symposium attracted a total 280 delegates from a number of different countries including North Cyprus, Turkey, Germany, Italy, United Kingdom, Malta, Saudi Arabia, Algeria and Iran. Institutions represented at the symposium included Universities, Research Institutes, NGO’s, Government Departments and Fisheries related businesses. Themes covered during the 3 days of the symposium included Demersal and Pelagic Fisheries, Aquaculture, Fishing Technologies and Processing, Conservation, Species Ecology & Reproductive Biology. In addition, there were special sessions on the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEC) and Eastern Mediterranean Maritime Jurisdiction. A total of 145 presentations were given and there were a number of business stands present from North Cyprus Chamber of Industry, YAGA (North Cypriot Development Agency), German businesses, Dardenel Cyprus & Deep Sea. Following the success of this symposium there are plans for future symposia during the coming years.

Notes:

1.      Ali Nesim, Yeni Kibris magazine, May-June 1989

2.      Dogru Yol newspaper, 8.12.1919

3.      Soz newspaper, 26.6.1930

4.      Kibris newspaper, 1.8.2010

5.      Kibris newspaper, 22.1.2009

6.      idem

7.      Kibris newspaper, 8.11.1998

8.      Yeni Duzen newspaper, 30.4.2013

9.      Final Reports of the Working Groups, The First Marine Conference of the Ministry of Works and Transport of the TRNC,  Nicosia, May 1998

(This paper was first presented on 16th May 2013 at a conference on “Cyprus’s Maritime Tradition: Past, Present and Future”, organized by the Cyprus Centre of the London Metropolitan University)

  

 

Thursday, May 9, 2013

AFTER 50 YEARS, IT IS TIME TO TALK NOW


Review of the book “Behind the curtain” by İbrahim Aziz, published by Peri Lihnon Afas, Nicosia, June 2011, 238 pages, with texts in Greek and Turkish.

The date was 29 July 2003, when my Greek Cypriot friend Christos Chattalos visited the office of the Avrupa newspaper, together with his journalist daughter from Berlin. I knew Christos from the days of my study in the German Democratic Republic, end of the 1970’s. It was a good chance to meet him after all those years and talk about the hot developments, during which the anti-Denktash movement was gaining strength.
Chattalos told me on that day for the first time that he knew personally the two Turkish Cypriot advocates, Ahmet Gürkan (38) and Ayhan Hikmet (35), who were having, through his mediation, contact with Derviş Ali Kavazoğlu, the Turkish Cypriot functionary of the AKEL. The contact was started before the publication of the “Cumhuriyet” (Republic) weekly newspaper on the Independence Day of the Republic of Cyprus, 16 August 1960 and it lasted until the murder of the two advocates by the Turkish Cypriot underground organization TMT on the night of 23 April 1962, when the newspaper declared that they would demask the person, who ordered the bombing of the Bayraktar Mosque, in order to undermine the friendship and the cooperation between the two founder communities of the Republic. The bombing and the murders were done according to the partition plans of the foreign powers.

I learned another important detail from Chattalos’s conversation with me that Gürkan and Hikmet were about to become members of the AKEL in a short time, if they were not murdered brutally. I had close friendship with the brothers of both of these advocates, Haşmet Gürkan and Hizber Hikmet and they did not say anything about their AKEL membership and this was a new information for me. Therefore I decided to ask my Turkish Cypriot friend İbrahim Aziz to make a detailed interview with our common friend Christos Chattalos. This was how the ball started to roll and it took Ibrahim eight years until he brought this book out, together with another short interview with one of Kavazoğlu’s friends, Leonidas Paphidis. He wrote an introductory part about Dervish Ali Kavazoğlu, which I shall refer to later on.  The book ends up with some interesting excerpts from the interrogations made by the Investigation Commission for the Bombing of the Bayraktar Mosque.
We have already read from the memoirs of Christakis Vanezos (Turkish edition, published in 2009), related with the two advocates that Vanezos coordinated a meeting between Kavazoğlu and the advocates Ahmet Gürkan and Ayhan Hikmet in the autumn of 1961 (p.18 of the Turkish edition). Now Christos Chattalos gives us more information about these meetings. For those, who are interested in the cooperation of the Turkish Cypriot and Greek Cypriot anti-imperialist progressive forces, there are a lot of information in this book, which came into light for the first time with Chattalos’s revelations. We are very thankful to him.

As far as I know, there had been some references to the AKEL membership of the two advocates previously. The first one was  by the Secretary-General of the AKEL, late Ezekias Papaioannou during the party’s 14th Congress in May 1978. The second reference was made by a Turkish Cypriot delegate to the AKEL Congress in 1986, who gave the names of Ahmet Sadi, Fazıl Önder, Ahmet Yahya, Ayhan Hikmet, Ahmet Muzaffer Gürkan and Derviş Ali Kavazoğlu as Turkish Cypriot AKEL members. Apart from these, there was no other written or oral evidence that the two advocates were working illegally within the Turkish Cypriot community as AKEL members.

In the narrative of Chattalos, we read the development of relations between Kavazoğlu and the two advocates, but it is not clear whether they became AKEL members after the approval of Kavazoğlu’s proposal by the party. Maybe their cooperation for the publication of the weekly newspaper “Cumhuriyet” and the foundation of the “Cyprus Turkish People’s Party” paved the way for their membership and maybe it could not be realized, because of their assassination on 23 April 1962. We need to have more official evidence from the AKEL, because even their relatives are not aware of such a membership.    
Gürkan, Hikmet and Kavazoğlu were true believers in the new Republic and they paid the cost of this with their lives. The lesson we took from the political experiences of these pioneers shows us that unless the Cypriot working class will not be able to establish a common internationalist front against the partitionist forces in and out of Cyprus, there will be no lasting solution to the ethnic-national question on our island.

I would like here to point out some other thoughts of mine that I had, after reading this book:

  1.  When the interviews were finished, I was told by İbrahim that he asked Aydın Hikmet to write a biography of his brother, Ayhan and İbrahim asked me to write Ahmet Gürkan’s biography. Aydın already published his brother’s biography in Afrika newspaper on 29 November 2008 and the slightly shortened version was put now in this book. I had prepared a research work of six full pages about his journalistic and political activities from 1946 up to his death in 1962, but I did not publish it somewhere. Now I am surprized to see in this book that my research work was shortened to 1/3 of the original length and was published without my name as a work of plagiarism by İbrahim Aziz. He also omitted to mention his references to my various books, where I compiled all the material from the Turkish Cypriot newspapers about the history of our working class movement. Furthermore, I had spent eight hours together with him for the editing of the Turkish text of the book.
  2. I also found out that there are factual mistakes and wrong evaluations in the section under the title “Derviş Ali Kavazoğlu”, written again by İbrahim Aziz.

“Emekçi” newspaper was not closed by the British colonial regime, “in essence in order to stop the dissemination of the left movement among the T/C community.” The reason was a libel case, opened by the T/C leader and owner of the Halkın Sesi newspaper, Dr.Küçük (literally meaning “small” in Turkish). Emekçi published an advertisement, in which it was written that “A small dog is lost and is being searched for”! Emekçi newspaper lost the court case. The court ordered them to pay 150 pounds as a fine and they had to ask for apology from Dr.Kucuk in Emekci newspaper. Since the publishers did not have this amount of money, Emekci had to stop its publication.

  1. It was not the newspaper “Haravgi”, but “Neos Democrates”, which was closed by the British Colonial Government in December 1955. 
  2. There were no revolts in some villages in Turkey in 1965, when Kavazoğlu was murdered, so that he would take them as an example of armed rebellion in the style of Castro and Che Guevara. He confused the events of the 1970’s, when some youth leaders started a set of guerilla activities in Turkey.  
  3. The author says: “Kavazoğlu and his friends, who were in the path of Marxist ideology and class struggle, were forced to struggle by taking refuge behind Ataturkism.” In fact, the two advocates were social democrats in their ideology and this could be seen in all their articles. In the second issue, the editorial of the Cumhuriyet was complaining that lately a T/C newspaper accused the T/C workers as  being communists and this was described as an hair-raising accusation! The 89 issues of the Cumhuriyet weekly newspaper did not propagate any Marxist ideology, but the rights of the workers and the villagers in line with the nationalist Ataturkist ideology. (see also “Our Path and Ideal”, 16 August 1960, No.1) The newspaper was very happy in supporting the military leaders of the Turkish junta of 27 May 1960.          
  4. The author says that Kavazoğlu tried to direct/govern the Cumhuriyet newspaper from behind the scene. In my opinion, this is an exaggeration. It is clear that Kavazoğlu had  cooperated with the two advocates, as they cooperated with Dr. İhsan Ali as well. According to my knowledge, especially Ahmet Gürkan was not a personality, who would be guided from behind.    
  5. The author writes that Kavazoğlu, who was the leader of the 1958 generation of T/C AKEL members, was spent out (by the AKEL) and that he would leave dealing with this matter in another research and analysis (see page 14-Turkish text). Later in the deep note No.9, he writes that Costas Mishaulis was given by the AKEL leaders as a companion to Kavazoğlu, when he drove to the place, where he was ambushed and killed.
  6. He alleges that Kavazoğlu spent himself and the entire T/C left in his endeavour  of  forming a separate party, which would have brotherly relations with the AKEL, since the AKEL could not be, because of its support for enosis, the one and only common Marxist party of the Greek Cypriots and the Turkish Cypriots (see page 25).         

Unless the AKEL publishes first-hand information about the activities of Kavazoğlu as the one and only Turkish Cypriot member of the Central Committee of the AKEL and about his  contradictions with the enosis policy of the AKEL, we shall not be able to judge the attitudes of each side. İbrahim Aziz should also write his own memoirs related with his own membership of AKEL and the insight of the policies of the AKEL for the Turkish Cypriots in detail. If there exists a continuation with the Turkish Cypriot Patriotic Union and the Republican Turkish Party as he alleges on page 160 of the Turkish text, then it will be very interesting to read all these details.
I would like to end with the questions put by Christakis Vanezos in his book on Derviş Ali Kavazoğlu:  “Were there negligence by the AKEL Central Committee?  Did this event happen as a result of the carelessness and negligence of the Party Administration? Did he enter this kind of endeavour without the consent of the party? Furthermore, did the policy of enosis, which was supported by the AKEL administration, drag him slowly slowly to an alianation with the party and was he led to base his activities on his personal relations? These questions are hanging in the air and they will stay for a long time like this. Only the Central Committee of the AKEL could answer these questions with full transparancy. This requires a real political virtue. Then Cypriots on both sides will learn the truth.”(p.41)

(The Greek translation of this review was published in the Greek-Cypriot daily “Politis” on 22nd August 2011)